Verbinding met ons

EU

Europese maatskappye dubbelspel

DEEL:

Gepubliseer

on

Last week, the European Union adopted the 14th package of sanctions, increasing pressure on Russia. The sanctions aim to limit Russia’s access to technology, finances, and resources, which should weaken its military potential and curb aggression towards Ukraine.

Ten spyte hiervan bly verskeie groot internasionale maatskappye in Rusland bedrywig, wat vrae laat ontstaan ​​oor dubbele standaarde. Onmiddellik na die begin van Russiese aggressie het die Kyiv School of Economics die portaal bekendgestel leave-russia.org, wat data publiseer oor maatskappye wat aanhou werk in Rusland, omseil die duidelik geartikuleerde posisie van die wêreldgemeenskap. Volgens die KSE is daar tans meer as 2000 sulke ondernemings: die lys sluit groot korporasies soos Chery, Philip Morris, Auchan, Pepsi, Leroy Merlin, Nestle en vele ander in. Maar spesiale aandag moet gegee word aan die feit dat sommige maatskappye steeds in die geheim werk.

Onder hulle is die Switsers-Sweedse skoonheidsmiddelreus Oriflame, which, despite its public statements about ceasing activities in Russia, continues to receive significant profits from the Russian market. Previously, the issue of Oriflame’s double standards policy was raised by Italian MEP Anna Bonfrisco, who questioned not only the tools for investigating and curbing some of the cosmetics giant’s operations but also the prospects of freezing the company’s assets in the EU with the subsequent inclusion of its legal entities in future sanctions packages.

Veldtog beeld

Die reaksie van die Europese Kommissie, verteenwoordig deur Kommissaris vir Finansiële Stabiliteit, Finansiële Dienste, en die Kapitaalmarktunie Mairead McGuinness, was taamlik ontwykend en het nie spesifieke voorstelle vir die oplossing van die situasie bevat nie – dit het teleurstelling onder aktiviste en die publiek veroorsaak.

Veldtog beeld

advertensie

Additionally, one of the sources of dissatisfaction is localized in Poland, where the company’s largest factory is located in the capital. At the end of May, Polish Sejm Deputy Lucjan Petrzyk addressed a question to the Minister of Trade and Industry regarding the suspension of the activities of Oriflame’s Russian legal entities. As of the end of June, there had been no response to the deputy’s inquiry. Earlier, journalists from agencja-informacyjna.com found that despite all the statements, Oriflame continues full-scale activities in Russia. The company’s products are sold through numerous channels, including Russian marketplaces and its own website, with the possibility of payment in rubles and delivery throughout the country. At the same time, alongside its activities in Russia, Oriflame supports Ukrainian soldiers.

Veldtog beeld

The issue is also being raised in Ukraine, where Verkhovna Rada Deputy Serhiy Kuzminykh demanded that “Oriflame Holding AG” be included in the list of international war sponsors. Based on responses to parliamentary inquiries (a copy of the inquiry is available to the editorial office), the issue of preventing the company from operating on two fronts is already under the control of the SBU and the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption, responsible for compiling the list of terrorism-sponsoring companies.

Although the efforts of Ukrainian authorities have yet to find proper resonance in Europe, it is worth noting the zeal with which Ukrainians defend their interests. Not long ago, the Ukrainian consulate in Switzerland, where Oriflame’s headquarters is located, sent an official inquiry to the company. But Oriflame’s response, as expected, was as abstract as possible, assuring that activities have been “reduced to almost a minimum.”

Veldtog beeld

Oriflame and similar companies continue to profit from the war while hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians risk their lives defending their country. Russia’s military aggression has exposed a new dimension of moral responsibility to consumers and the world community – large international companies must take this into account even when it conflicts with their commercial interests. In the era of global awareness and instant information exchange, consumers demand transparency and sincerity, and any form of duplicity instantly becomes public knowledge.

Deel hierdie artikel:

EU Reporter publiseer artikels uit 'n verskeidenheid van buite bronne wat 'n wye verskeidenheid van standpunte uitdruk. Die standpunte wat in hierdie artikels ingeneem word, is nie noodwendig dié van EU Reporter nie.

Neigings